Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---

Am Mon, 28 Oct 2024 22:08:50 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 10/28/2024 9:56 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 10/28/24 9:09 PM, olcott wrote:

On 10/28/2024 6:56 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

>
It is IMPOSSIBLE to emulate DDD per the x86 semantics without the
code for HHH, so it needs to be part of the input.

At machine address 0000217a HHH emulates itself emulating DDD without
knowing that it is emulating itself.

Then how did it convert the call HHH into an emulation of DDD again?

When HHH (unknowingly) emulates itself emulating DDD this emulated HHH
is going to freaking emulate DDD.

Of course. For that it needs its own code. This doesn't need to be
marked specially as being itself (HHH is not conscious), it just
needs to be identical to the running code.

--
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.