Sujet : Re: neos Universal Compiler
De : rjh (at) *nospam* cpax.org.uk (Richard Heathfield)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 18. Mar 2025, 16:26:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Fix this later
Message-ID : <vrc3ap$2ovm4$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 18/03/2025 15:06, Mr Flibble wrote:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:01:34 +0000, Richard Heathfield wrote:
On 18/03/2025 14:30, Mr Flibble wrote:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 14:20:04 +0000, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>
On 18/03/2025 14:08, Mr Flibble wrote:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:59:45 +0200, Mikko wrote:
>
On 2025-03-17 16:53:01 +0000, Mr Flibble said:
>
On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:21:05 +0200, Mikko wrote:
>
On 2025-03-16 18:40:42 +0000, Mr Flibble said:
>
On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 12:28:24 +0200, Mikko wrote:
>
On 2025-03-15 15:08:47 +0000, Mr Flibble said:
>
On Sat, 15 Mar 2025 11:55:52 +0200, Mikko wrote:
>
On 2025-03-15 04:00:52 +0000, Mr Flibble said:
>
Hi!
>
neos universal compiler (that can compile any programming
language)
is successfully running the tokenization stage tokenizing a
program written in the neos reference language. #cpp #coding
#compiler #compsci #gamedev
>
/Flibble
>
Can it tokenize FORTRAN 60 or FORTRAN IV ?
>
ANY programming language.
>
/Flibble
>
How is neos configured to tokenize FORTRAN 60 ?
>
The same way you would configure it for any other programming
language.
>
If it is configured the same for each programming language then
how does it know how to tokenize?
>
You configure it by providing a language specific neosBNF schema
(grammar)
file (an input to the compilalation process).
>
Is there a neosBNF schema that describes the tokens of FORtRAN 66 or
Algol 60?
>
Not yet.
>
We deduce, then, that neos universal compiler (that can compile any
programming language) cannot compile FORTRAN 66 or ALGOL 60.
>
We can further deduce that you do not consider FORTRAN 66 and ALGOL 60
to be programming languages.
>
Your deduction is wrong, my universal compiler has the CAPABILITY to
compile any programming language and to add support for a particular
language a schema file has to be provided.
>
So what you seem to be saying is that your universal compiler lacks the
CAPABILITY to compile any programming language until that capability is
added. So my first deduction was correct.
Your first deduction was incorrect.
Tis tisn't tis.
Have a good day.
-- Richard HeathfieldEmail: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
Re: neos Universal Compiler
Re: neos Universal Compiler