Sujet : Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 04. Apr 2025, 09:05:08
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vso3rj$2vems$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 08:41:35 +0100, Richard Heathfield wrote:
On 04/04/2025 08:21, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
At every point N, we have the first N digits of our
hypothetical number-that-is-not-in-the-list. But we have an infinitude
of remaining numbers in the list we haven’t looked at, among which all
possible combinations of those N digits will occur.
Show me your first N digits, and I'll show you a counterexample.
Counterexample to what?
Therefore there is guaranteed to be some number we haven’t looked at
yet with all those first N digits the same.
And yet you still won't post those first N digits.
Digit 1 is the first digit of entry 1 in the list.
Digit 2 is the second digit of entry 2 in the list.
.
.
.
Digit N is the Nth digit of entry N in the list.