Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
On 4/19/2025 2:48 AM, Mikko wrote:Unproven non-exitence of counter-examples is not a proof. In particularOn 2025-04-17 19:57:30 +0000, olcott said:All mental, computational or logical reasoning
On 4/17/2025 2:19 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:It seems that there is an error above as I can't parse it. But it isolcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:It is self-evident that there are no exceptions to the ruleOn 4/17/2025 6:49 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:[ .... ]olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:On 4/16/2025 1:09 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> wrote:On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 13:29:18 +0100, Richard Heathfield wrote:
All of logic, reasoning and computation boils down to finite string
transformations on inputs deriving outputs.That's a big assertion, one you have not proved. It is one you can't
prove, even were it true, since you don't understand the concept of
proof.When a categorically exhaustive search is made it is self-evident thatIt is not at all self-evident.
all computation, logic, and human reasoning has as its barest possible
essence transforming input finite strings into outputs via finite
string transformations.
the all truth that is entirely anchored in fully formalized
semantics an be expressed as finite string transformations
from input finite strings.
not clear how that should be corrected.
boils down to finite string transformation rules
applied to finite strings deriving finite string
outputs.
That no counter-example to this rule exists is its proof.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.