Re: Definition of real number ℝ --infinitesimal--

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c theory 
Sujet : Re: Definition of real number ℝ --infinitesimal--
De : polcott2 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 28. Mar 2024, 18:53:08
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uu479l$3mm2m$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/28/2024 11:43 AM, Andy Walker wrote:
On 28/03/2024 16:07, olcott wrote:
Yet it seems that wij is correct that 0.999... would seem to
be infinitesimally < 1.0.
      That /cannot/ be correct in the "real" numbers, in which there
are no infinitesimals [basic axiom of the reals].  In other systems of
numbers, it could be correct,
Yes.

but that will depend on what is meant by
"0.999..",
Approaching yet never reaching 1.0.

and note that if you appeal to something that mentions limits
to define this, then you have to explain how infinite and infinitesimal
numbers are handled in the definition.
 
                  One geometric point on the number line.
[0.0, 1.0) < [0.0, 1.0] by one geometric point.
      Until you describe the axioms of what you mean by "geometric
point" and "number line", this is meaningless verbiage.  Give your
Of course by geometric point I must mean a box of chocolates and by
number line I mean a pretty pink bow. No one would ever suspect that
these terms have their conventional meanings.

axioms, and it becomes possible to discuss this.  Until then, we are
entitled to assume that you and Wij are talking about the "traditional"
"real" numbers [as used in engineering, etc.] in which there are no
infinitesimals, and so the only interpretation we can make of the size
of "one geometric point" is the usual "measure", which is zero.
 
Yet it is never actually zero because it is possible to specify a
line segment that is exactly one geometric point longer than another.
[0.0, 1.0] - [0.0, 1.0) = one geometric point.

     To repeat [to both you and Wij]:  *Show us your axioms, and this
may perhaps be worth discussing.*  In particular, we need to know where
and why you are departing from standard axiomatisations of the reals.
[For the latter, simplest is to google for "axioms of real numbers",
which throws up dozens of articles ranging from elementary to extremely
advanced.]
 
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Nov 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal