Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
On 5/5/2024 10:53 PM, Richard Damon wrote:I Have, Note, I POSTED the actual time stamps of a series that showed that they were in order, and that the time stamps were NOT just in "Universal Time" but Local Time.On 5/5/24 11:27 PM, olcott wrote:That actual time/date stamp of your messages is makingOn 5/5/2024 8:05 PM, Richard Damon wrote:>On 5/5/24 8:38 PM, olcott wrote:>On 5/5/2024 5:57 PM, Richard Damon wrote:>
Your replies are coming before the posts that they respond to
>
Could the fact that I am in a different Time zone than you be a factor?
>
Note, I wrote the message you are quoting at 6:57 PM my time, but that would be 5:57 PM your time.
>
>
Now, if I WAS posting replies before they were sent, that would be a majr development.
You are posting replies that are coming up before my
much later posts. I think that your system clock may
be off. USENET goes by universal time thus is not
effected by timezones.
>
No, if your system is sorting messages wrong, then your system is just off.
>
them come before several messages that I posted before
you posted these messages.
Don't just assume that I must be wrong look at your watch
and check that with your system clock.
My guess is that you did something to break your system.As I posted, the time stamps of those messages were all in the right order.It always used to be that messages that you posted after messages
>
Note, "Usenet" doesn't care about the Timestamp of the message, but your client might.
>
Again, you don't understand how things work.
>
that I posted came at the bottom of the messages that I posted.
In the message format, Time stamps are SUPPOSED to have a time zone connected to them, saying what time zone the stated time is from.
>
It is not "just universal time".
>
You may want to read the RFCs before you just prove even more how stupid you are.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.