Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?

On 5/25/24 1:56 PM, olcott wrote:

On 5/25/2024 7:52 AM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 5/25/24 12:28 AM, olcott wrote:

  

That you H, by just needing to be a "Pure Funtion" is not necessarily the computatinal eqivalent of a Turing Machine.
>

>
Totally moot for the subject line.

>
Nope, ESSENTINTIAL. I am not asking you to change your definition, just accept its consequences.
>

 typedef int (*ptr)();  // ptr is pointer to int function in C
00       int H(ptr p, ptr i);
01       int D(ptr p)
02       {
03         int Halt_Status = H(p, p);
04         if (Halt_Status)
05           HERE: goto HERE;
06         return Halt_Status;
07       }
08
09       int main()
10       {
11         H(D,D);
12         return 0;
13       }
 The above template refers to an infinite set of H/D pairs where D is
correctly simulated by pure function H. This was done because many
reviewers used the shell game ploy to endlessly switch which H/D pair
was being referred to.
 *Correct Simulation Defined*
    This is provided because many reviewers had a different notion of
    correct simulation that diverges from this notion.
     A simulator is an x86 emulator that correctly emulates at least one
    of the x86 instructions of D in the order specified by the x86
    instructions of D.
     This may include correctly emulating the x86 instructions of H in the
    order specified by the x86 instructions of H thus calling H(D,D) in
    recursive simulation.
 *Execution Trace*
Line 11: main() invokes H(D,D); H(D,D) simulates lines 01, 02, and 03 of
D. This invokes H(D,D) again to repeat the process in endless recursive
simulation.
 *This is only talking about the H/D c function pairs*
*This is only talking about the H/D c function pairs*
*This is only talking about the H/D c function pairs*
*This is only talking about the H/D c function pairs*
*This is only talking about the H/D c function pairs*
 *This is only talking about the H/D c function pairs*
*This is only talking about the H/D c function pairs*
*This is only talking about the H/D c function pairs*
*This is only talking about the H/D c function pairs*
*This is only talking about the H/D c function pairs*
 

So, what is the answer to my questions?
DO you argree to my analysis of what your words mean and thus the limitations of what they say?
Or, is your problem you just don't know what that means?
Or, are you refusing to answer because to answer cuts off the lies you want to do in a future step?
Failure to answer just means you don't really want your question answered.