Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
On 6/1/2024 1:13 PM, joes wrote:Aborting a simulation means it doesn't tell you anything about the halting status of the input.Am Thu, 30 May 2024 17:01:05 -0500 schrieb olcott:void Infinite_Recursion(u32 N)On 5/30/2024 4:54 PM, joes wrote:That is more commonly called a terminating function. Pure refers to theAm Thu, 30 May 2024 09:55:24 -0500 schrieb olcott:To actually understand my words (as in an actual honest dialogue)
>Everyone with sufficient knowledge of C can easily determine that DYeah, of course not, if H doesn’t halt.
correctly emulated by any *pure function* H (using an x86 emulator)
cannot possibly reach its own simulated final state at line 06 and halt.
you must pay careful attention to every single word. Maybe you
had no idea that *pure functions* must always halt.
absence of side effects.
>Or maybe you did not know that every computation that never reachesExactly. Aborting a simulation makes it incorrect.
its own final state *DOES NOT HALT* even if it stops running because
it is no longer simulated.
>
{
Infinite_Recursion(N);
}
If aborting a simulation makes it incorrect then simulated termination
analyzer HH(Infinite_Recursion, 5) would be required to remain stuck in
infinite execution.
I concur.Because this is a key piece of my life's work and my POD24 diagnosis
indicates that I am running out of time I intend to keep posting this
until I have three concurrences or one correct rebuttal.
>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.