Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong ---

On 6/2/2024 4:36 AM, joes wrote:

Am Sat, 01 Jun 2024 17:37:28 -0500 schrieb olcott:
 

On 6/1/2024 5:30 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 6/1/24 5:27 PM, olcott wrote:

On 6/1/2024 4:15 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 6/1/24 4:35 PM, olcott wrote:

On 6/1/2024 3:29 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 6/1/24 12:46 PM, olcott wrote:

On 6/1/2024 11:33 AM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 6/1/24 12:18 PM, olcott wrote:

On 6/1/2024 11:08 AM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 6/1/24 11:58 AM, olcott wrote:

On 6/1/2024 10:46 AM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 6/1/24 10:00 AM, olcott wrote:

 

Every DD correctly simulated by any HH of the infinite set of HH/DD
pairs that match the above template never reaches past its own
simulated line 03 in 1 to ∞ steps of correct simulation of DD by HH.

>
But since the simulation was aborted,

>
*The above never mentions anything about any simulation being aborted*

Not simulating an infinite number of steps of infinite recursion is
incorrect. You always forget this requirement: the simulation must be
complete.

When HH correctly simulates N steps of DD it is incorrect to say
that these N steps were incorrectly simulated.

What are the sets of HH and DD? I thought they were concrete machines.
 

typedef int (*ptr)();  // ptr is pointer to int function in C
00       int HH(ptr p, ptr i);
01       int DD(ptr p)
02       {
03         int Halt_Status = HH(p, p);
04         if (Halt_Status)
05           HERE: goto HERE;
06         return Halt_Status;
07       }
08
09       int main()
10       {
11         HH(DD,DD);
12         return 0;
13       }
The infinite set of every HH/DD pair where HH correctly simulates
1 or more steps of DD is the infinite set that I am referring to.
Some of the HH of these sets may play bingo with themselves before
or after they simulate DD.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer