Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters

Op 10.jul.2024 om 16:53 schreef olcott:

On 7/10/2024 9:41 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 10.jul.2024 om 16:16 schreef olcott:

On 7/10/2024 9:09 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 10.jul.2024 om 14:37 schreef olcott:

On 7/10/2024 2:13 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 09.jul.2024 om 23:18 schreef olcot

_DDD()
[00002163] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
[00002164] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
[00002166] 6863210000 push 00002163 ; push DDD
[0000216b] e853f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DDD)
>
DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that
correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD can't make it
past the above line of code no matter what.
>
[00002170] 83c404     add esp,+04
[00002173] 5d         pop ebp
[00002174] c3         ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002174]

>
Which proves that HHH does not interpret x86 code correctly.

>
*It interprets the code correctly*
https://github.com/wfeldt/libx86emu

>

>
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
*correctly emulates 1 to ∞ steps of DDD*
>

>
You seem to be stuck in infinite invalid reasoning.
A simulator cannot simulate 1 to ∞ steps at the same time.

 For the entire infinite set of every possible HHH the
semantics of the x86 language conclusively proves that
no DDD every halts.

Which conclusively proves that none of these simulations was correct.
For each of them, the semantics of the x86 conclusively proves that it aborts one cycle too soon. Therefore, each of them is incorrect. The only reason why the simulation does not halt, is that it is aborted one cycle too soon.
The one that simulates 1 step is incorrect.The one that simulates 2 steps is incorrect, etc. Even the one that simulates ∞ steps is incorrect.
If not, tell us which of the infinite set is correct.