Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away with mere rhetoric

olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:

On 7/23/2024 2:26 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-07-22 16:10:55 +0000, olcott said:

On 7/20/2024 3:03 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:

[ Followup-To: set ]

In comp.theory Fred. Zwarts <F.Zwarts@hetnet.nl> wrote:

[ .... ]

Olcott could not point to an error, but prefers to ignore it. So, I
will
repeat it, until either an error is found, or olcott admits that HHH
cannot possibly simulate itself correctly.

This has the disadvantage of making your posts boring to read.  All but
one poster on this newsgroup KNOW that Olcott is wrong, here.

Continually repeating your argument won't get him to admit he's wrong.
Richard has been trying that for much longer than you have, with the
same lack of success.  Olcott's lack of capacity for abstract reasoning,
combined with his ignorance, combined with his arrogance, prevent him
learning at all.

May I suggest that you reconsider your strategy of endless repetition?

Thanks!

Rebuttals like yours are entirely baseless by failing to point out any
mistake.

What makes you think taht Alan Mackenzie was trying to rebut what
Fred. Zwarts had said?

In other words you don't see the ad hominem attacks against
me that are listed above?

What, exactly, is wrong with what you call my "ad hominem attacks"?  In
most of what you write on this group you are objectively wrong, and you
simply ignore other people's arguments that establish that fact.  You
repeat falsehood after falsehood here, and don't do it in a polite
fashion, either.

You ignore rational argument, and repeat your falsehoods many hundreds of
times.  You lack the capacity for abstract reasoning, as has been pointed
out several times by several people, most notably by Mike Terry.  You are
arrogant, in that you believe yourself to be a genius, without any
supporting evidence.  You are ignorant of the foundations of mathematical
logic, and your arrogance prevents you learning it.

In short, trying to debate technical matters with you is a total waste of
time, as many people have found out.  Most of them have given up and gone
away.

I see nothing wrong in what you call the "ad hominem attacks" against
you.  They are true, and relevant to the rest of the discussion here.

--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).