Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?
Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?
Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?
Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Olcott is too stupid to know that only the DDD correctly simulated by onlly the HHH that doesn't abort cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated,by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?
Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated,by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? BUT ONLY that DDD Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? BUT ONLY that DDD Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? BUT ONLY that DDD Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? BUT ONLY that DDD Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? BUT ONLY that DDD Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? BUT ONLY that DDD Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? BUT ONLY that DDD Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? BUT ONLY that DDD Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? BUT ONLY that DDD Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? BUT ONLY that DDD Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? BUT ONLY that DDD Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? BUT ONLY that DDD Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? BUT ONLY that DDD Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? BUT ONLY that DDD Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? BUT ONLY that DDD Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? BUT ONLY that DDD Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? BUT ONLY that DDD Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? BUT ONLY that DDD Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? HHH computes the mapping from its input finite sting to the actual behavior specified by this finite string Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- HHH never reaches its halt state so never decides, or it decides wrong. Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it Re: HHH computes the mapping from its input finite sting to the actual behavior specified by this finite string (Which is the results of running the input) Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?