Sujet : Re: Latest revision of my paper incorporating feedback --- last remaining sticking point
De : abc (at) *nospam* def.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 07. Aug 2024, 14:21:15
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v8vscb$32fso$9@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 8/7/2024 3:21 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 06.aug.2024 om 16:43 schreef olcott:
void DDD()
{
HHH(DDD);
return;
}
>
int main()
{
HHH(DDD);
}
>
Understanding that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot
possibly reach its own "return" instruction is a mandatory
prerequisite to further discussion.
A correct understanding that HHH cannot possibly simulate itself correctly is therefore enough to stop the discussion.
That you insist and disagreeing with the semantics of the x86
language seems that you really want to avoid any honest dialogue
and only want to play head games.
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
Latest revision of my paper incorporating feedback --- last remaining sticking point
Re: behaviour and description --- Lying Peter