Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state

On 8/9/2024 4:03 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-08-08 13:18:34 +0000, olcott said:
 

void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}
>
Each HHH of every HHH that can possibly exist definitely
*emulates zero to infinity instructions correctly* In
none of these cases does the emulated DDD ever reach
its "return" instruction halt state.

 The ranges of "each HHH" and "every HHH" are not defined above
so that does not really mean anything.
 

Here is something that literally does not mean anything:
"0i34ine ir m0945r (*&ubYU  I*(ubn)I*054 gfdpodf["
"Colorless green ideas sleep furiously"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colorless_green_ideas_sleep_furiously
Has lots of meaning, that does not totally fit together coherently.
I defined an infinite set of HHH x86 emulators.
I stipulated that each member of this set emulates
zero to infinity instructions of DDD.
*I can't say it this way without losing 90% of my audience*
Each element of this set is mapped to one element of the
set of non-negative integers indicating the number of
x86 instructions of DDD that it emulates.
*This one seems to be good*
Each element of this set corresponds to one element of
the set of positive integers indicating the number of
x86 instructions of DDD that it emulates.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer