Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth

On 8/17/2024 9:10 AM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 8/17/24 8:31 AM, olcott wrote:

On 8/17/2024 7:29 AM, olcott wrote:

void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
}
 _DDD()
[00002172] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
[00002173] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
[00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
[0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
[0000217f] 83c404     add esp,+04
[00002182] 5d         pop ebp
[00002183] c3         ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
 *It is a basic fact that DDD emulated by HHH according to*
*the semantics of the x86 language cannot possibly stop*
*running unless aborted* (out of memory error excluded)
 

 Simulating Termination Analyzer H is Not Fooled by Pathological Input D
 https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/369971402_Simulating_Termination_Analyzer_H_is_Not_Fooled_by_Pathological_Input_D   

 And here you admit to your scam.
 You call HHH an "emulator" in describeing DDD, but it is a termination Analyzer when it is ruhn.
 

 I am not going to go around and around with you on this.
Every reply that diverges from the exact words written
to the tiniest extent will be construed as deception.