Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c theory 
Sujet : Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 21. Aug 2024, 01:18:47
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <be7dafc940185a78b8a8599e3c462a0436a27156@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 8/20/24 9:13 AM, olcott wrote:
On 8/20/2024 3:45 AM, joes wrote:
Am Mon, 19 Aug 2024 23:33:52 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 8/19/2024 11:02 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 8/19/24 11:50 PM, olcott wrote:
On 8/19/2024 10:32 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 8/19/24 10:47 PM, olcott wrote:
*Everything that is not expressly stated below is*
*specified as unspecified*
Looks like you still have this same condition.
I thought you said you removed it.
>
_DDD()
[00002172] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping [00002173]
8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping [00002175] 6872210000 push
00002172 ; push DDD [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call
HHH(DDD)
[0000217f] 83c404     add esp,+04 [00002182] 5d         pop ebp
[00002183] c3         ret Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
But it can't emulate DDD correctly past 4 instructions, since the 5th
instruciton to emulate doesn't exist.
And, you can't include the memory that holds HHH, as you mention HHHn
below, so that changes, but DDD, so the input doesn't and thus is
CAN'T be part of the input.
Changing the code, but not the address, constitutes a change.
>
x86utm takes the compiled Halt7.obj file of this c program
https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c Thus making
all of the code of HHH directly available to DDD and itself. HHH
emulates itself emulating DDD.
>
Which is irrelevent and a LIE as if HHHn is part of the input, that
input needs to be DDDn
And, in fact,
Since, you have just explicitly introduced that all of HHHn is
available to HHHn when it emulates its input, that DDD must actually
be DDDn as it changes.
>
Thus, your ACTUAL claim needs to be more like:
X = DDD∞ emulated by HHH∞ according to the semantics of the x86
language Y = HHH∞ never aborts its emulation of DDD∞
Z = DDD∞ never stops running
The above claim boils down to this: (X ∧ Y) ↔ Z
>
Yes that is correct.
>
So, you only prove that the DDD∞ that calls the HHH∞ is non-halting.
Not any of the other DDDn
>
Your problem is that for any other DDDn / HHHn, you don't have Y so
you don't have Z.
>
HHHn correctly predicts the behavior of DDD the same way that HHHn
correctly predicts the behavior of EEE.
>
Nope, HHHn can form a valid inductive proof of the input.
It can't for DDDn, since when we move to HHHn+1 we no longer have
DDDn but DDDn+1, which is a different input.
>
You already agreed that (X ∧ Y) ↔ Z is correct.
Did you do an infinite trace in your mind?
>
But only for DDD∞, not any of the other ones.
>
If you can do it and I can do it then HHH can do this same sort of
thing. Computations are not inherently dumber than human minds.
>
But HHHn isn't given DDD∞ as its input, so that doesn't matter.
>
All of the DDD have identical bytes it is only the HHH that varies.
HHHn(DDD) predicts the behavior of HHH∞(DDD).
It does this same same way that HHHn(EEE)
predicts the behavior of HHH∞(EEE).
The bytes of HHH are part of DDD.
>
 *The following criteria only means*
HHHn(DDD) correctly predicts the behavior of HHH∞(EEE) and HHH∞(DDD)
Except that HHHn can't emulate DDD onlyu DDDn since if it includes the HHH that it calls, which is HHHn, you have different inputs for each HHHn, and thus the proper name for it is DDDn

 <MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
     If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its input D
     until H correctly determines that its simulated D would never
     stop running unless aborted then
 
Right, correctly determine for the input, an dthat means ALL the input, and this EXACGT input.
Every HHHn gets a differenct input, so you can't tallk about them as if they were the same without being a LIAR.
Sorry, that is just the facts, something that seems to be beyond your understnding.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 Aug 24 * Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5326olcott
20 Aug 24 +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5323Richard Damon
20 Aug 24 i`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5322olcott
20 Aug 24 i `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5321Richard Damon
20 Aug 24 i  +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V515olcott
20 Aug 24 i  i+* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V55joes
20 Aug 24 i  ii`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V54olcott
21 Aug 24 i  ii +- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V51Richard Damon
21 Aug 24 i  ii +- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V51Mikko
27 Aug 24 i  ii `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V51Mikko
20 Aug 24 i  i+* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V58Fred. Zwarts
20 Aug 24 i  ii`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V57olcott
20 Aug 24 i  ii +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V53joes
20 Aug 24 i  ii i`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V52olcott
21 Aug 24 i  ii i `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V51Richard Damon
21 Aug 24 i  ii +- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V51Richard Damon
21 Aug 24 i  ii `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V52Fred. Zwarts
27 Aug 24 i  ii  `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V51Mikko
27 Aug 24 i  i`- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V51Mikko
20 Aug 24 i  `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5305olcott
21 Aug 24 i   `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5304Richard Damon
21 Aug 24 i    `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser303olcott
21 Aug 24 i     +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser300Richard Damon
21 Aug 24 i     i`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser299olcott
21 Aug 24 i     i +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser296Richard Damon
21 Aug 24 i     i i`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser295olcott
21 Aug 24 i     i i +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser293Richard Damon
21 Aug 24 i     i i i`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser292olcott
21 Aug 24 i     i i i +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser284Mikko
21 Aug 24 i     i i i i`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser283olcott
21 Aug 24 i     i i i i +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser3joes
21 Aug 24 i     i i i i i`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser2olcott
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i `- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1Richard Damon
21 Aug 24 i     i i i i +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser11Fred. Zwarts
21 Aug 24 i     i i i i i`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser10olcott
21 Aug 24 i     i i i i i +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser3joes
21 Aug 24 i     i i i i i i`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser2olcott
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i i `- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i +- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Richard Damon
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser5Fred. Zwarts
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i  `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser4olcott
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   +- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1joes
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   +- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Richard Damon
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Fred. Zwarts
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser267Richard Damon
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i+* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser3olcott
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i ii+- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Richard Damon
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i ii`- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser263olcott
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser262Richard Damon
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i  `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser261olcott
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser84Richard Damon
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser83olcott
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser82Richard Damon
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i  `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser81olcott
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser29Fred. Zwarts
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser28olcott
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i +- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Python
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser24joes
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser23olcott
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser5joes
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser4olcott
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i +- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1Richard Damon
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i +- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1joes
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i `- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1Fred. Zwarts
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser15Richard Damon
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser14olcott
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser11Richard Damon
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i i`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser10olcott
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i i +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser8Richard Damon
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i i i`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser7olcott
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i i i `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser6Richard Damon
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i i i  `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser5olcott
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i i i   +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser3Richard Damon
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i i i   i`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser2olcott
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i i i   i `- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1Richard Damon
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i i i   `- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i i `- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i +- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i `- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1Fred. Zwarts
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i +- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1Fred. Zwarts
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i `- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i +- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Fred. Zwarts
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Fred. Zwarts
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser31joes
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser30olcott
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i +- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1Richard Damon
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser28joes
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i  `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser27olcott
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i   `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser26Fred. Zwarts
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i    `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Execution trace of simulating termination analyzer HHH on DDD input25olcott
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input10joes
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     i`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input9olcott
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     i `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input8Fred. Zwarts
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     i  +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input3olcott
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     i  i+- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input1Richard Damon
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     i  i`- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input1Fred. Zwarts
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     i  `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input4Mikko
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     i   `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input3olcott
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     i    +- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input1Richard Damon
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     i    `- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input1Fred. Zwarts
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     +- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Execution trace of simulating termination analyzer HHH on DDD input1Richard Damon
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Execution trace of simulating termination analyzer HHH on DDD input13Fred. Zwarts
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   +- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Richard Damon
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser19Mikko
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser176joes
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
21 Aug 24 i     i i i +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser6Richard Damon
27 Aug 24 i     i i i `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
27 Aug 24 i     i i `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
21 Aug 24 i     i +- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
27 Aug 24 i     i `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
21 Aug 24 i     +- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
27 Aug 24 i     `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
20 Aug 24 `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V52Mikko

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal