Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser

On 8/22/2024 3:21 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 21.Aug.2024 OM 20:52 olcott:

>
You keep missing the idea that HHH does a partial
simulation of DDD to predict what would happen if
this HHH never aborted its simulation of DDD.
>
>

You keep missing the idea that HHH must predict the behaviour of its input (the HHH that does a partial simulation), not the behaviour of a different hypothetical non-input (the HHH that never aborted).

The would be stupid. If that was the case then HHH could ignore
its input and accept every input as halting including this one:
void Infinite_Loop()
{
   HERE: goto HERE;
}

There is a reason why HHH has an input. If it were correct to predict the behaviour of a hypothetical non-input, then HHH would not need an input.

That is stupid

Are you still cheating with the Root variable to change the behaviour of HHH from an input to a non-input?

--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer