Re: Libelous statement by Alan

On 10/10/24 2:22 PM, olcott wrote:

On 10/10/2024 12:05 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:

Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> wrote:

On 2024-10-09 19:34:34 +0000, Alan Mackenzie said:

>

Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> wrote:

On 10/8/24 8:49 AM, Andy Walker wrote:

... after a short break.

>

     Richard -- no-one sane carries on an extended discussion with
someone they [claim to] consider a "stupid liar".  So which are you?
Not sane?  Or stupid enough to try to score points off someone who is
incapable of conceding them?  Or lying when you describe Peter?  You
must surely have better things to do.  Meanwhile, you surely noticed
that Peter is running rings around you.

>

In other words, you don't understand the concept of defense of the truth.

>

Maybe, but continuously calling your debating opponent a liar, and doing
so in oversized upper case, goes beyond truth and comes perilously close
to stalking.

>

Calling a liar a liar is fully justified. I don't know how often it
needs be done but readers of a liar may want to know that they are
reading a liar.

>
We know Peter Olcott has lied in things that matter.  However, I believe
his continual falsehoods are more a matter of delusion than mendacity.
As Mike Terry has said, OP's intellectual capacity is low.  Calling him
a liar in virtually every post is, I think, unwarranted.
>

 The fact that no one can even point out a single mistake
conclusively proves that any lying is not on my side of
the dialogue.

Which could be taken as a libelous statement towards everyone that HAS pointed out errors that you haven't even tried to refute.
Since your logic is based on lies, your attempt a defense based on truthful statements will just fail. Remember, for that defense, you have the burden of proof, and your "fast talk" will certainly fall flat.

 void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}
 HHH is an x86 emulation based termination analyzer.
Each DDD emulated by any HHH that it calls never returns.
 Each of the directly executed HHH emulator/analyzers that returns
0 correctly reports the above non-terminating behavior of its input.
 Fully operational code is here.
https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c