Sujet : Ben didn't bother to see that my reply is necessarily true --- We can know that all blue cars are blue
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 13. Oct 2024, 01:53:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vef5lh$bknp$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 10/12/2024 7:24 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> writes:
... stuff ...
If you must reply, take care with the subject line. There's no reason
to help spread PO's misrepresentation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-evidenceOn 10/14/2022 7:44 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> I don't think that is the shell game. PO really /has/ an H
> (it's trivial to do for this one case) that correctly determines
> that P(P) *would* never stop running *unless* aborted.
Thus when H is an emulating termination analyzer that reports
on whether or not its emulation of its input finite string x86
machine code P(P) must be aborted H is unequivocally correct.
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer