Re: The actual truth is that ... industry standard stipulative definitions

On 10/19/2024 7:00 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-10-19 11:17:38 +0000, olcott said:
 

On 10/19/2024 3:54 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-10-16 17:14:55 +0000, olcott said:
>

On 10/16/2024 3:23 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-10-15 12:33:47 +0000, olcott said:
>

On 10/15/2024 3:54 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-10-14 16:05:20 +0000, olcott said:
>

A stipulative definition is a type of definition in which
a new or currently existing term is given a new specific
meaning for the purposes of argument or discussion in a
given context. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stipulative_definition
>
*Disagreeing with a stipulative definition is incorrect*

>
The Wikipedia page does not say that. It only says that a stipulative
definition itself cannot be correct.

>
If X cannot be incorrect then disagreeing that X is correct
is incorrect.

>
While agreement with a definition is incorrect in some sense one
can choose whether to accept the or reject the definition.
>

It says nothing about disagreement.
In particular, one may diagree with the usefulness of a stipulative
definition.

>
It seems that my reviewers on this forum make being disagreeable
a top priority.

>
Irrelevant.

>
Not at all. If reviewers are lying about my work
that is libelous.

>
As is if you lie about your reviewers.

>
I never lie because I believe that this could
result in eternal damnation.

 So you say. Would be more credible if you would sometimes show some
honesty.
 

It seems to me that I am always honest and most
of my reviewers mostly use the strawman deception
in all of their rebuttals.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer