Re: The actual truth is that ... industry standard stipulative definitions

On 10/19/2024 10:29 AM, joes wrote:

Am Sat, 19 Oct 2024 07:35:23 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 10/19/2024 7:00 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-10-19 11:17:38 +0000, olcott said:

On 10/19/2024 3:54 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-10-16 17:14:55 +0000, olcott said:

On 10/16/2024 3:23 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-10-15 12:33:47 +0000, olcott said:

On 10/15/2024 3:54 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-10-14 16:05:20 +0000, olcott said:

 

It says nothing about disagreement.
In particular, one may diagree with the usefulness of a
stipulative definition.

It seems that my reviewers on this forum make being disagreeable a
top priority.

Irrelevant.

Not at all. If reviewers are lying about my work that is libelous.

This is not a court.

As is if you lie about your reviewers.

I never lie because I believe that this could result in eternal
damnation.

Never attribute to malice what is adequately explained by stupidity.

So you say. Would be more credible if you would sometimes show some
honesty.

It seems to me that I am always honest and most of my reviewers mostly
use the strawman deception in all of their rebuttals.

Same here.
 

It my case I can detect the strawman because everyone
changes the exact words that I said into an incorrect
paraphrase.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer