Re: What I told ChatGPT is essentially identical to the first page of my paper

On 10/21/24 12:12 AM, olcott wrote:

On 10/20/2024 10:19 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 10/20/24 6:26 PM, olcott wrote:

On 10/20/2024 4:00 PM, joes wrote:

Am Sun, 20 Oct 2024 15:23:28 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 10/20/2024 2:13 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 10/20/24 1:33 PM, olcott wrote:

This is the only new material that sums up the essence of what a
simulating termination analyzer is.
>
Termination Analyzer HHH simulates its input until it detects a
non-terminating behavior pattern. When HHH detects such a pattern it
aborts its simulation and returns 0.

But for the pattern that it detects to be correct, it must be that all
input that exhibit that pattern must never halt when run.

If your try to get away with telling ChatGPT that it will explain your
error in great detail as it already does when I brought that up.
https://chatgpt.com/share/6709e046-4794-8011-98b7-27066fb49f3e

Why don't the nested HHHs abort?
>

>
Why don't the nested instances of HHH abort their input?
*It answered this quite well*

>
No, you don't, you LIE about it becuase you don't know what a program is
>

 Let us all see how effective your double-talk is against
ChatGPT 4.0. Are you chicken?
 

I guess you can't read, as I already got it to admit that you were wrong and I was right, and posted that.
Your ignoring of evidence is just more proof that you are nothing but a pathological liar, worse than the election deniers and climate change deniers.
Sorry, you are just showing how brainwashed you have made yourself. It seems your mind is impervious to facts.