Re: Verified facts regarding the software engineering of DDD, HHH, and HHH1 --- TYPO

On 10/24/24 8:56 PM, olcott wrote:

On 10/24/2024 6:23 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 10/24/24 9:36 AM, olcott wrote:

On 10/23/2024 9:48 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 10/23/24 9:51 PM, olcott wrote:

ChatGPT does completely understand this.
>

>
But, it is just a stupid idiot that has been taught to repeat what it has been told.
>

>
It is a brilliant genius that seems to infallibly deduce all
of the subtle nuances of each of the consequences on the basis
of a set of premises.

>
I guess you don't undetstand how "Large Language Models work, do you.
>
It has NO actual intelegence, or ability to "deduce" nuances, it is just a massive pattern matching system.
>
All you are doing is proving how little you understand about what you are talking about,
>
Remember, at the bottom of the page is a WARNING that it can make mistakes. And feeding it LIES, like you do is one easy way to do that.
>

 There is much more to this than your superficial
understanding.  Here is a glimpse:
https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/03/04/1089403/large-language- models-amazing-but-nobody-knows-why/
 The bottom line is that ChatGPT made no error in its
evaluation of my work when this evaluation is based on
pure reasoning. It is only when my work is measured
against arbitrary dogma that cannot be justified with
pure reasoning that makes me and ChatGPT seem incorrect.
 If use your same approach to these things we could say that
ZFC stupidly fails to have a glimmering of understanding of
Naive set theory. From your perspective ZFC is a damned liar.
 

The articles says no such thing.
In fact, it comments about the problem of "overfitting" where the processing get the wrong answers because it over generalizes.
This is because the modeling process has no concept of actual meaning, and thus of truth, only the patterns that it has seen.
AI's don't "Reason", they patern match and compare.
Note, that "arbitrary dogma" that you try to reject, are the RULES and DEFINITONS of the system that you claim to be working in.
By your logic, Trump was right that he won, because he was saying we need to ignore the "dogma" of the truth and rules about voting, but instead use the fact that he got more votes than anyone else prior. That is the "proof" that he must have won, and the fact that Biden got more than him is just a misuse of "dogma".
Sorry, you are just proving how utterly STUPID and IGNORANT you are, and that you logic has absolutely ZERO basis.
Your new dependence of Chat GPT just shows your stupidity, as it has been PROVEN to give wrong answers, and to just create bald face lies at time. Which is one reason it comes with the disclaimer that it makees mistakes.
If your "logic system" is built on logic that is allowed to make mistakes, it isn't really a logic system, which is based on the ability to really prove things.
But then, you never seemed to have understood what a proof was, or the difference between truth and knowledge, so your logic has always been messed up.