Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---

On 11/3/24 12:58 PM, olcott wrote:

On 11/3/2024 11:53 AM, Mike Terry wrote:

On 03/11/2024 13:19, olcott wrote:

On 11/3/2024 3:19 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-11-02 10:21:09 +0000, Andy Walker said:
>

On 02/11/2024 08:43, Mikko wrote:

A false assertion is a lie even if nobody asserts it.

[PO:]

Not at all. The base meaning of {lie} requires intentional
deception.

That may be its base meaning but the full meaning includes
all false statements. The statement itself does not change
when someone states it so there is no clear advantage in
saying that the statement was not a lie until someone stated
it.

>
    Disagree.  There is a clear advantage in distinguishing those
who make [honest] mistakes from those who wilfully mislead.

>
That is not a disagreement.
>

>
The term "lie" is to only be applied to intentionally
deceitful statements. To apply the term "lie" to statements
not having intentional deceit <is> itself intentional deceit.
>

>
Not if the person making that claim sincerely believes it. :)  You are being inconsistent here...

 Richard has said that he does not mean intentional
deceit when he calls me a liar, yet uses the term
"liar" anyway knowing that others will take this
to mean intentional deceit. So Richard is a liar
for calling me a liar.
 

Because the word doesn't just mean intential deciet.
And you are an intentional liar to say it only means that, as you have been shown the definition.
IF you won't accept the truth, then you become the classical case of the pathological liar that lies because he can not tell the difference between truth and lies, and speaks with a reckless disreguard for the truth.