Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
On 11/3/2024 4:17 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 11/3/24 4:27 PM, olcott wrote:On 11/3/2024 3:14 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 11/3/24 1:40 PM, olcott wrote:On 11/3/2024 12:22 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 11/3/24 12:58 PM, olcott wrote:On 11/3/2024 11:53 AM, Mike Terry wrote:On 03/11/2024 13:19, olcott wrote:On 11/3/2024 3:19 AM, Mikko wrote:On 2024-11-02 10:21:09 +0000, Andy Walker said:
hehe :)The term "lie" is to only be applied to intentionally deceitfulNot if the person making that claim sincerely believes it. :)
statements. To apply the term "lie" to statements not having
intentional deceit <is> itself intentional deceit.
>
You are being inconsistent here...
Liar.Yes. I don't have much life left so yes.>>Unless you always qualify you use of the term "liar" asRichard has said that he does not mean intentional deceit when heBecause the word doesn't just mean intential deciet.
calls me a liar, yet uses the term "liar" anyway knowing that
others will take this to mean intentional deceit. So Richard is a
liar for calling me a liar.
>
And you are an intentional liar to say it only means that, as you
have been shown the definition.
>
{unintentional falsity} it is the kind of defamation suit that you
will lose because the communication process always assumes the
primary meaning of a term unless otherwise specified.
Nope, I guess you learned your law just as good as your logic,
Since a "reasonable" person will undetstand that statements that are
clearly false under the standard mean can be considered to be lies.
*That not the way it works bro. Don't bet your house on that*
Would YOU bet your savings on it?
*This is my official cease-and-desist notification*
STOP CALLING ME A LIAR !!!
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.