Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:That you denigrate what I say without paying attention to whatOn 11/9/2024 10:03 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:On 11/9/2024 5:01 AM, joes wrote:On 11/8/24 12:25 PM, olcott wrote:Gödel showed otherwise.That formal systems that only apply truth preserving operations
to expressions of their formal language that have been
stipulated to be true cannot possibly be undecidable is proven
to be over-your-head on the basis that you have no actual
reasoning as a rebuttal.That is counter-factual within my precise specification.That's untrue - you don't have a precise specification. And even if you
did, Gödel's theorem would still hold.When truth is only derived by starting with
truth and applying truth preserving operations
then unprovable in PA becomes untrue in PA.No. Unprovable will remain.*Like I said you don't pay f-cking attention*Stop swearing. I don't pay much attention to your provably false
utterances, no. Life is too short.
Hint: Gödel's theorem applies in any sufficiently powerful logicalUnless it is stipulated at the foundation of the notion of
system, and the bar for "sufficiently powerful" is not high.
ZFC did the same thing and that was the ONLY wayUnprovable(L,x) means Untrue(L,x)If you're going to change the standard meaning of standard words, you'll
Unprovable(L,~x) means Unfalse(L,x)
~True(L,x) ^ ~True(L, ~x) means ~Truth-Bearer(L,x)
find communicating with other people somewhat strained and difficult.
[ .... ]--
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.