Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
On 11/20/2024 10:00 PM, Richard Damon wrote:DDD emulated by HHH does not have a property that is like "halting".On 11/20/24 9:57 PM, olcott wrote:DDD emulated by HHH does not halt. You lie about thisOn 11/20/2024 5:51 PM, Richard Damon wrote:>On 11/20/24 5:03 PM, olcott wrote:>On 11/20/2024 3:53 AM, Mikko wrote:>On 2024-11-20 03:23:12 +0000, olcott said:>
>On 11/19/2024 4:12 AM, Mikko wrote:>On 2024-11-18 20:42:02 +0000, olcott said:>
>On 11/18/2024 3:41 AM, Mikko wrote:>The "the mapping" on the subject line is not correct. The subject line>
does not specify which mapping and there is no larger context that could
specify that. Therefore it should be "a mapping".
>
On 2024-11-17 18:36:17 +0000, olcott said:
>void DDD()>
{
HHH(DDD);
return;
}
>
_DDD()
[00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping
[00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping
[00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
[0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
[0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04
[00002182] 5d pop ebp
[00002183] c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>
DDD emulated by any encoding of HHH that emulates N
to infinity number of steps of DDD cannot possibly
reach its "return" instruction final halt state.
Because it cannot reach the instructions before tha return.
Because it cannot reach the instruction after the HHH call.
Because it cannot reach return instruction of HHH.
>This applies to every DDD emulated by any HHH no>
matter the recursive depth of emulation. Thus it is
a verified fact that the input to HHH never halts.
That is too vague to be regareded true or false. It is perfectly possibe
to define two programs and call them DDD and HHH
What a jackass. DDD and HHH have been fully specified
for many months.
They are specified in a way that makes your "every DDD" and "any DDD"
bad (perhaps even incorrect) use of Common language.
>
I specify the infinite sets with each element numbered
on the top of page 2 of my paper. Back in April of 2023
>
https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/369971402_Simulating_Termination_Analyzer_H_is_Not_Fooled_by_Pathological_Input_D
You have also specifed that HHH is the program in your GitHub repository.
>
Should I assume that you must be lying about
this because you did not quote where I did this?
You forget how many times you have posted the link to your "fully functioning code"?
>
You can't have it both ways, either that *IS* the code of HHH.
>
My code is one example of the infinite set of every possible
HHH that emulates DDD according to the semantics of the x86
language.
But it gets the wrong answer for the halting problem, as DDD dpes halt.
>
and condemn yourself to actual Hell. Are you a fake Christian?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.