Re: A third line of cancer treatment reversed the growth of the right paracaval lymph node

On 2/6/25 1:26 PM, olcott wrote:

On 2/6/2025 10:52 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:

Am 05.02.2025 um 16:11 schrieb olcott:

On 2/5/2025 1:44 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:

Am 05.02.2025 um 04:38 schrieb olcott:

This treatment does not typically last very long and
will be immediately followed by a riskier fourth line
of treatment that has an initial success rate much higher
than its non progression mortality rate.
>

>
Halting problem solved !
>

>
The halting problem proof input does specify non-halting
behavior to its decider.
>
https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/369971402_Simulating_Termination_Analyzer_H_is_Not_Fooled_by_Pathological_Input_D

>
LOOOOOOOOL

 Anyone that understands the C programming language
sufficiently well (thus not confused by the unreachable
"if" statement) correctly understands that DD simulated
by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction.
 

And anyone that understand the halting problem knows that isn't the question being asked. The quesiton you NEED to ask is will the program described by the input halt when run?
Since you start off with the wrong question, you logic is just faulty.
You are just showing your ignorance of the subject.

When we add a little computer science to this then we
know that the input to HHH does not halt.

No, the program described by the input to HHH does halt if HHH(DDD) return 0.
Thus, that answer can not be the correct answer to the halting problem, and all you are doing is proving you are nothing but an ignorant pathological lying idiot.

 typedef void (*ptr)();
int HHH(ptr P);
 int DD()
{
   int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
   if (Halt_Status)
     HERE: goto HERE;
   return Halt_Status;
}
 int main()
{
   HHH(DD);
}