Re: Universal Compiler

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c theory 
Sujet : Re: Universal Compiler
De : Muttley (at) *nospam* DastardlyHQ.org
Groupes : comp.lang.c++ comp.theory
Date : 09. Feb 2025, 10:16:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vo9rpc$hlnr$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
On Sat, 08 Feb 2025 16:46:54 +0000
Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> wibbled:
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 16:40:09 -0000 (UTC), Muttley@dastardlyhq.com
wrote:
Take a ticket and join the clue of delusionals who think they can re-invent
the wheel so much better than people with decades of experience.
>
Ah, the ad hominim attack; why am I not surprised?  You need to learn
how to properly engage in a technical argument, dear.

You have had a habit in the past of making grand pronouncements of your
own abilities and have demonstrated bugger all. Why will this be any different?

Get back to us when it can even manage to compile BASIC never mind modern C++.
>
>
BASIC would be trivial to support.

Go on then, lets see it.

Btw, what CPUs are you targeting?
>
TBD

Oh right, so you're just working on a parser, not an actual compiler. Got it.



Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Feb 25 * Re: Universal Compiler6Muttley
9 Feb 25 `* Re: Universal Compiler5Muttley
9 Feb 25  +* Re: Universal Compiler3James Kuyper
9 Feb 25  i`* Re: Universal Compiler2James Kuyper
10 Feb 25  i `- Re: Universal Compiler1Muffley
10 Feb 25  `- Re: Universal Compiler1Muffley

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal