Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH

On 2/12/25 11:21 PM, olcott wrote:

On 2/12/2025 4:04 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-02-11 14:41:38 +0000, olcott said:
>

Of course not. However, the fact that no reference to that article
before or when HHH

>
That paper and its code are the only thing that I have been talking about in this forum for several years.

>
Doesn't matter when you don't say that you are talking about that paper.
>
Anyway, that is irrelevant to the fact that the subject line contains
a false claim.
>

 It is a truism and not one person on the face of the
Earth can possibly show otherwise.

No, your paper is just a LIE, and your statement is not a truism, and you are just proving that you are nothing but a stupid liar that doesn't understand what

 Since there is a 5% chance that the treatment I will
have next month will kill me and this treatment is
my only good chance I will totally ignore anything
that diverges from the point.
 

Since you were never "on" the point, since you don't understand the meaning of the terms you use, you have always just been wrong.
Part of your problem is you are so stuck in your own ideas, you refuse to even consider that you might be totally lost, and thus dive deeper into your false ideas.