Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF

On 2025-02-16 01:13:56 +0000, olcott said:

On 2/15/2025 2:49 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-02-14 12:40:04 +0000, olcott said:
 

On 2/14/2025 2:58 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-02-14 00:07:23 +0000, olcott said:
 

On 2/13/2025 3:20 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-02-13 04:21:34 +0000, olcott said:
 

On 2/12/2025 4:04 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-02-11 14:41:38 +0000, olcott said:
 

Of course not. However, the fact that no reference to that article
before or when HHH

 That paper and its code are the only thing that I have been talking about in this forum for several years.

 Doesn't matter when you don't say that you are talking about that paper.
 Anyway, that is irrelevant to the fact that the subject line contains
a false claim.

 It is a truism and not one person on the face of the
Earth can possibly show otherwise.

 The fact that the claim on subject line is false is not a truism.
In order to determine the claim is false one needs some knowledge
that is not obvious.

 When you try to show the steps attempting to show that
it is false I will point out the error.

 Step 1: Find people who know C.
Step 2: Show them DD of OP and ask.
 

This is the only topic that I will discuss and any

 typedef void (*ptr)();
int HHH(ptr P);
 int DD()
{
   int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
   if (Halt_Status)
     HERE: goto HERE;
   return Halt_Status;
}
 int main()
{
   HHH(DD);
}
 DD  correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally.

 That claim has already shown to be false. Nothing above shows that
HHH does not return 0. If it does DD also returns 0.

 *You (and everyone else) is proven wrong by the following*

Wrong, as shown below.

918-1156  // All of the lines of termination analyzer HHH

Not mentioned above.
Not specified by DD as shown above.

1355-1370 // DD() through main()

Not mentioned above. In this discussion DD and main are as shown above.

https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c

Not mentioned above and not specified by DD.

The assembly language source code of every function in Halt7.c
https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7out.txt

Irrelevant as not specified by DD.

This shows the complete execution trace of
(a) main
(b) DD

Main calls HHH, not DD. The execution trace of DD is not shown.

It does not show the 171 pages of execution trace of HHH.
This can be much more easily verified by the provided
239 lines of source code: 918-1156
 Although the code for HHH is very difficult to understand
(Only Mike has ever really tried to understand it)
At least now it is all in one single contiguous block.
 The x86utm operating system functions that it calls
are found here:
https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/x86utm.cpp
 https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/include/Read_COFF_Object.h

No statement about anyone being proven wrong or contradicting anything
is inferred. Because of the errors identified above such inrefence would
be wrong anyway.
Therefore the claim quoted above is wrong.
--
Mikko