DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference

On 2/20/2025 4:38 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:

olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:

On 2/20/2025 2:38 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-02-20 00:31:33 +0000, olcott said:

 [ .... ]
 

I have given everyone here all of the complete source code for a few
years

 

True but irrelevant. OP did not specify that HHH means that particular
code.

 

Every post that I have been talking about for two or
more years has referred to variations of that same code.

 Yes.  It would be a relief if you could move on to posting something new
and fresh.
 

As soon as people fully address rather than endlessly dodge
my key points I will be done.
Let's start with a root point.
All of the other points validate this root point.
*Simulating termination analyzer HHH correctly determines*
*the non-halt status of DD*
*According to the UTPTO patent law practice I am incorporating*
*the following paper and source-code by reference*
https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s217.html
Simulating Termination Analyzer H is Not Fooled by Pathological Input D
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369971402_Simulating_Termination_Analyzer_H_is_Not_Fooled_by_Pathological_Input_D 918-1156  // All of the lines of termination analyzer HHH
1355-1370 // DD() through main()
https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c

-- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

 

--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer