Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy

On 2/22/25 11:43 AM, olcott wrote:

On 2/22/2025 5:01 AM, joes wrote:

Am Fri, 21 Feb 2025 21:55:32 -0600 schrieb olcott:

On 2/20/2025 4:00 AM, joes wrote:

 

Not even the variable Root in line 502 of Halt7.c?

https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c You are not even
in the correct function.

1059
>

 Unless we go through a 100% precise sequence of steps
my reviewers will always consistently dodge the point
as they have done for several years.
 typedef void (*ptr)();
int HHH(ptr P);
 int DD()
{
   int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
   if (Halt_Status)
     HERE: goto HERE;
   return Halt_Status;
}
 int main()
{
   HHH(DD);
}
 The first point is DD correctly simulated by HHH cannot
possibly terminate normally by reaching its own "return"
instruction.
 My proof is very important because it provides the key
basis for a chat bot that can spot and perfectly refute
lies in real time. This could save the planet and save
Democracy.
 

But the defined HHH doesn't do a correct simulation, but aborts and thus your whole arguement is based on LIES.
All you are proving is that you think logic allows lies.