Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
On 2/25/2025 12:49 PM, dbush wrote:Yes.On 2/25/2025 1:01 PM, olcott wrote:Finally you made something that was not wrong in several different ways.On 2/25/2025 10:13 AM, Mikko wrote:>Althogh the subject line has the words "COMPLETE PROOF" there is no>
proof or pointer to proof below.
>
>
typedef void (*ptr)();
int HHH(ptr P);
>
int DD()
{
int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
if (Halt_Status)
HERE: goto HERE;
return Halt_Status;
}
>
int main()
{
HHH(DD);
}
>
The above does specify that DD simulated by HHH
cannot possibly terminate normally by reaching its
own "return" instruction.
>
That this may be beyond your technical skill level.
is less than no rebuttal at all.
>
Ignoring the code in main() seemed dishonest.
>
int no_numbers_greater_than_10();
>
int F(uintptr_t p);
>
int no_numbers_greater_than_10()
{
return F((uintptr_t)no_numbers_greater_than_10);
}
>
int main()
{
F((uintptr_t)no_numbers_greater_than_10);
return 0;
}
>
>
The above does specify that no_numbers_greater_than_10 simulated by F
cannot possibly terminate normally by reaching its
own "return" instruction.
>
That this may be beyond your technical skill level
is less than no rebuttal at all.
So what is your point?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.