Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy

On 2025-02-25 21:13:36 +0000, olcott said:

On 2/25/2025 8:49 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-02-24 23:28:30 +0000, olcott said:
 

On 2/24/2025 2:41 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-02-23 17:35:46 +0000, olcott said:
 

On 2/23/2025 4:46 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-02-22 16:43:24 +0000, olcott said:
 

My proof is very important because it provides the key
basis for a chat bot that can spot and perfectly refute
lies in real time. This could save the planet and save
Democracy.

 Unlikely to work if you let the chat bot to assume or infer
that false <-> true.

 When its knowledge is correctly encoded it would never make
that stupid mistake.

 If you build the bot from a proof that implies that true <-> false

 THEN YOU ARE ENCODING IT INCORRECTLY.
TRUE ↔ FALSE is stupidly wrong.
Why are you suggesting something that is stupidly wrong?

 Because what you have presented as "proof" are based on claims that
are sufficient for the proof of true <-> false.
 

Please provide the reasoning for that stupid nonsense

In this discussion you have assumeed that HHH does abort its simulation
and that HHH does not abort its simulation. Therefore the statement can
be inferred "HHH aborts its simulation" to be both true and false, so
true <-> false.
--
Mikko