Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH

On 2/26/25 11:42 PM, olcott wrote:

On 2/26/2025 10:05 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 26.feb.2025 om 15:49 schreef olcott:

On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott:

On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

>

>
You already know that you are stupidly wrong about
the emulation being incorrect or you would have provided
the correct emulation sequence long ago.
>
_DD()
[00002133] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
[00002134] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
[00002136] 51         push ecx      ; make space for local
[00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD
[0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD)
[00002141] 83c404     add esp,+04
[00002144] 8945fc     mov [ebp-04],eax
[00002147] 837dfc00   cmp dword [ebp-04],+00
[0000214b] 7402       jz 0000214f
[0000214d] ebfe       jmp 0000214d
[0000214f] 8b45fc     mov eax,[ebp-04]
[00002152] 8be5       mov esp,ebp
[00002154] 5d         pop ebp
[00002155] c3         ret
Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155]
>
What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH?
>

>
The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th instruction, the 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction,

You dodged the actual question.
What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH.
>

>
Olcott does not understand that it was an answer.

 Anything besides a specific sequence of machine addresses
dishonestly dodges my question.
 

And since the contents of 000015C3 hasn't been given as part of the input, the correct simulation can not occur after the call.
You are just proving you are nothing but a stupid fraud that needs to depend on changing the meaning of the words in the middle of the arguement.
That you can't see that is wrong, just proves that you are nothing but a stupid pathological liar.