Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH

On 2/27/25 12:04 AM, olcott wrote:

On 2/26/2025 5:53 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 2/26/25 9:45 AM, olcott wrote:

On 2/26/2025 3:29 AM, joes wrote:

Am Tue, 25 Feb 2025 20:13:43 -0600 schrieb olcott:

On 2/25/2025 5:41 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

>
>

The behavior of DD emulated by HHH only refers to DD and the fact that
HHH emulates this DD.

On on hand, the simulator can have no influence on the execution.

>

On the other, that same simulator is part of the program.
You don't understand this simple entanglement.
>

>
Unless having no influence causes itself to
never terminate then the one influence that
it must have is stopping the emulation of this input.
>

>
But it isn't an EXTERNAL influnce, but the behavior of the code of the program itself, in the code of HHH that DD calls, which *IS* part of DD.
>
You are just proving you don't kno

 We are asking can DD emulated by HHH possibly reach its
own return instruction?

No, maybe that is the strawman you are tring to invent.

 Dishonest dodges away from this point are less than no rebuttal at all.
 

Yes, *YOUR* dishonest dodges from what the words you use actually mean just proves that you are totally ignorant of what you are talking about, and that you don't care just proves that you are just a pathological liar, and that you are so stupid you can't see that you are stupid,
Sorry, but you are just proving that you are worse than the things you claim you are trying to save the world from, as your "logic" is based on the assumption of the impossible, and the validity of lying about things.