Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH

On 2/27/2025 7:00 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 2/27/25 2:06 PM, olcott wrote:

On 2/27/2025 3:36 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 27.feb.2025 om 05:40 schreef olcott:

On 2/26/2025 9:52 AM, joes wrote:

Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:49:42 -0600 schrieb olcott:

On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott:

On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

>

You already know that you are stupidly wrong about the emulation
being incorrect or you would have provided the correct emulation
sequence long ago.
What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH?

The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th
instruction, the 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this
instruction,

What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH.

There can be no correct continuation.

I say what the correct simulation is.
You say that I am wrong.
If I am wrong then a correct simulation must exist.

HHH1 did a correct simulation, so, there it is.

That dishonestly dodged the original question:
What are the first 15 *lines of DD* correctly emulated by HHH?

PROBLEM BLOWS UP as the value of memory 000015c3 isn't specified as
part

When you are told that this address specifies an x86 emulator then
disagreement is incorrect.