Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code

On 3/1/2025 4:05 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 01.mrt.2025 om 22:11 schreef olcott:

On 3/1/2025 2:16 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 01.mrt.2025 om 17:33 schreef olcott:

On 3/1/2025 9:39 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 01.mrt.2025 om 15:41 schreef olcott:

On 3/1/2025 6:49 AM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 2/28/25 7:47 PM, olcott wrote:

When we hypothesize that the code at machine address 0000213c is
an x86 emulator then we know that DD remains stuck in recursive
emulation and cannot possibly reach its own "ret" instruction
and terminate normally.
When we add the additional complexity that HHH also aborts this
sequence at some point then every level of recursive emulation
immediately stops. This does not enable any DD to ever reach its
"ret" instruction.
>

But then you just negated your first assumption, as a partial
emulator that aborts its emulation, then DD no longer gets stuck.
>

Cannot possibly reach its own "ret" instruction and terminate
normally

proves failure of HHH to reach the end of a proven terminating
program.

>
DD emulated by HHH according to the above x86 machine code of DD
cannot possibly reach its own "ret" instruction and terminate
normally

>

The DD input to HHH unequivocally specifies a non terminating
computation.

In other words, HHH did not terminate the simulation.

 
Your paraphrase seems intentionally dishonest at this point in our
dialogue.