Failure to meet this challenge proves that all of my reviewers are wrong [2]

On 2/27/2025 3:00 PM, joes wrote:

Am Thu, 27 Feb 2025 13:06:41 -0600 schrieb olcott:

On 2/27/2025 3:36 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 27.feb.2025 om 05:40 schreef olcott:

On 2/26/2025 9:52 AM, joes wrote:

Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:49:42 -0600 schrieb olcott:

On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott:

On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

>

You already know that you are stupidly wrong about the emulation
being incorrect or you would have provided the correct emulation
sequence long ago.
What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH?

The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th instruction,
the 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction,

What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH.

There can be no correct continuation.

If I am wrong then a correct simulation must exist.

HHH1 did a correct simulation, so, there it is.

That dishonestly dodged the original question:
What are the first 15 *lines of DD* correctly emulated by HHH?

Look at what HHH1 does.
 

_DD()
[00002133] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
[00002134] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
[00002136] 51         push ecx      ; make space for local
[00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD
[0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD)
[00002141] 83c404     add esp,+04
[00002144] 8945fc     mov [ebp-04],eax
[00002147] 837dfc00   cmp dword [ebp-04],+00
[0000214b] 7402       jz 0000214f
[0000214d] ebfe       jmp 0000214d
[0000214f] 8b45fc     mov eax,[ebp-04]
[00002152] 8be5       mov esp,ebp
[00002154] 5d         pop ebp
[00002155] c3         ret Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155]

Anyway: ignoring the call to HHH

It moronically stupid unless HHH ignores this call and
HHH does not ignore this call.
HHH emulates itself emulating DD at this point as this
code conclusively proves.
https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c
Your lack of comprehension of that code is less than
no rebuttal at all.
*The question is*
What are the hexadecimal machine addresses of the first
10 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH?
A failure to answer that question with ten hexadecimal
values proves that the reviewer is either dishonest or
clueless.

because it doesn't call DD in turn,
we continue with 2141 until the conditional jump, whereupon we
either enter an infinite loop (which is more than 15 instructions)
or proceed to return (which is 13 instructions), depending on the
return value of HHH.
 

--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer