Sujet : Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Kicking the straw-man deception out on its ass
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 04. Mar 2025, 01:51:02
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <b1f9c64a4ec1cc18c3a2b988c0e1ac8b826b4807@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/3/25 9:02 AM, olcott wrote:
On 3/3/2025 2:24 AM, joes wrote:
Am Sun, 02 Mar 2025 22:19:48 -0600 schrieb olcott:
On 3/2/2025 9:46 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 3/2/25 9:22 PM, olcott wrote:
On 3/2/2025 6:42 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 3/2/25 4:49 PM, olcott wrote:
On 3/2/2025 3:29 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 3/2/25 4:21 PM, olcott wrote:
>
WHich only shows that HHH can not correctly emulate its input and
give an answer.
>
The fact that HHH does correctly determine that DD emulated by HHH
cannot possibly reach its own "ret"
instruction and terminate normally proves that your claim is counter
factual.
>
You say that, but it isn't true,
>
You keep trying to get away with saying that the fact that DD calls
its own emulator in recursive emulation does not change the behavior
from the behavior of the directly executed DD.
Obviously. DD is fixed.
>
And you keep on making the claim without evidence!!!!
What instruction acted differently between the to, that was directly
executied and correctly emulated to different results.
>
The call to HHH(DD) from the directly executed DD returns to DD. The
call to HHH(DD) from DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly return
BECAUSE IT CALLS ITS OWN EMULATOR.
Which proves that HHH can't simulate itself, since the rest is the same.
>
That your technical skills are insufficient to understand
the code that conclusively proves that HHH does emulate
itself emulating DD
https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c
Is far less than no rebuttal at all.
NO, it proves that HHH only PARTIALLY emulates itself.
Your don't seem to know the difference, because you don't seem to understand what a correct emulation needs to be.
Of course, if you are willing to say that HHH does an INCORRECT emulaiton of itself, we can agree, but that blows your theory out of the water.
And the factd that is what it does, says your theory is at the bottom of the lake.
I never said it that clearly ever before.
Maybe you should have.
>
DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Kicking the straw-man deception out on its ass
Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Kicking the straw-man deception out on its ass