Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Kicking the straw-man deception out on its ass

Op 04.mrt.2025 om 01:31 schreef olcott:

On 3/3/2025 2:01 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 03.mrt.2025 om 15:08 schreef olcott:

On 3/3/2025 2:46 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 02.mrt.2025 om 23:28 schreef olcott:

On 3/2/2025 4:15 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 02.mrt.2025 om 22:21 schreef olcott:

int DD()
{
   int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
   if (Halt_Status)
     HERE: goto HERE;
   return Halt_Status;
}
>
_DD()
[00002133] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
[00002134] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
[00002136] 51         push ecx      ; make space for local
[00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD
[0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD)
[00002141] 83c404     add esp,+04
[00002144] 8945fc     mov [ebp-04],eax
[00002147] 837dfc00   cmp dword [ebp-04],+00
[0000214b] 7402       jz 0000214f
[0000214d] ebfe       jmp 0000214d
[0000214f] 8b45fc     mov eax,[ebp-04]
[00002152] 8be5       mov esp,ebp
[00002154] 5d         pop ebp
[00002155] c3         ret
Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155]
>
DD emulated by HHH according to the behavior that DD
specifies cannot possibly reach its own "ret" instruction
and terminate normally.
>
This process computes the mapping from the actual input
(not any other damn thing) finite string to the non
terminating behavior that this finite specifies when
it calls its own emulator in recursive emulation.

>
In other words 'non terminating behavior' means that *HHH* was unable to reach the 'ret' instruction.

>
Not at all. The fact that DD calls its own emulator
makes DD unable to reach its own "ret" instruction.
>

>
Counter factual. The exact same finite string in direct execution or simulated by HHH1 shows that DD is perfectly able to reach its 'ret'

>
Because neither of these cases has DD calling its own emulator.
Ignoring how this changes the behavior of DD is stupid.
>

>
Indeed, HHH is a simulator that cannot possibly simulate itself correctly up to the end,

I repeatedly showed the failure of HHH to reach the 'ret' instruction of the finite string that is its input, where the direct execution and other simulators have no problem with exactly the same finite string to reach this 'ret' instruction.
Olcott claims that HHH does not fail to reach this 'ret' instruction.
If this was not stupidly wrong you could show
all of the steps of DD correctly emulated by HHH
that reaches its own "ret" instruction.
You cannot do that because:
(a) You know that you are wrong
(b) You do not understand these things
I don't understand why Olcott keeps repeating the failure of HHH to reach the 'ret' instruction.