Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals

On 3/4/2025 11:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 3/4/25 11:51 PM, olcott wrote:

On 3/4/2025 10:44 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 3/4/25 7:39 PM, olcott wrote:

On 3/4/2025 5:45 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 3/4/25 9:17 AM, olcott wrote:

On 3/4/2025 3:14 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 04.mrt.2025 om 04:07 schreef olcott:

int DD()
{
   int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
   if (Halt_Status)
     HERE: goto HERE;
   return Halt_Status;
}
>
_DD()
[00002133] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
[00002134] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
[00002136] 51         push ecx      ; make space for local
[00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD
[0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD)
[00002141] 83c404     add esp,+04
[00002144] 8945fc     mov [ebp-04],eax
[00002147] 837dfc00   cmp dword [ebp-04],+00
[0000214b] 7402       jz 0000214f
[0000214d] ebfe       jmp 0000214d
[0000214f] 8b45fc     mov eax,[ebp-04]
[00002152] 8be5       mov esp,ebp
[00002154] 5d         pop ebp
[00002155] c3         ret
Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155]
>
DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly
reach its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally.

I wonder why Olcott keeps repeating that HHH fails to reach the 'ret' instruction, where the direct execution or world-class simulators have no problem to reach the 'ret' instruction of exactly the same finite string as input.

>
The only valid rebuttal is to show all of the steps of
exactly how DD correctly emulated by HHH reaches its
own "ret" instruction.

>
No,

>
Meaning:
(a) You don't have a clue how to do this all of your
rebuttals have been pure bluster with zero technical
competence behind them.
>
(b) You know that I am correct and are simply lying.
>

>
Nope, it just proves that

>
Dodging this point is your only rebuttal to it:
DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach
its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally.
>
>

 And you are just dodging that the HHH that correctly emualates its input, will never answer when given a DD built on it, so it isn't the needed decider.
 

DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach
its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally.
Your ADD makes you too scatter brained to stay on that point
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer