Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals ---PSR---

Op 06.mrt.2025 om 04:53 schreef olcott:

On 3/5/2025 9:31 PM, dbush wrote:

On 3/5/2025 10:17 PM, olcott wrote:

On 3/5/2025 7:10 PM, dbush wrote:

>
In other words, you know that what you're working on has nothing to do with the halting problem, but you don't care.

>
In other words I WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY BULLSHIT DEFLECTION.
You have proven that you know these things pretty well SO QUIT THE SHIT!
>

>
You want people to accept that HHH(DD) does in fact report that changing the code of HHH to an unconditional simulator and running HHH(DD) will not halt.
>

 DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly
reach its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally.

Yes, we agree that HHH fails to reach the 'ret' instruction, where direct execution and correct simulators do not have a problem to reach that instruction. Congratulations with creating a simulator that cannot possibly complete the simulation of the halting program described by the finite string in its input.

 It took me over two years to come up with those irrefutable
words that sum of the key essence of my whole proof.

Those two years could have been spend for useful things.