Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
Op 06.mrt.2025 om 21:13 schreef olcott:Not at all. Trying to get away with changing the subjectOn 3/6/2025 3:13 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:No rebuttal. So, we agree that HHH fails to reach the 'ret' instruction.Op 06.mrt.2025 om 04:53 schreef olcott:>On 3/5/2025 9:31 PM, dbush wrote:>On 3/5/2025 10:17 PM, olcott wrote:>On 3/5/2025 7:10 PM, dbush wrote:>>>
In other words, you know that what you're working on has nothing to do with the halting problem, but you don't care.
In other words I WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY BULLSHIT DEFLECTION.
You have proven that you know these things pretty well SO QUIT THE SHIT!
>
You want people to accept that HHH(DD) does in fact report that changing the code of HHH to an unconditional simulator and running HHH(DD) will not halt.
>
DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly
reach its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally.
Yes, we agree that HHH fails to reach the 'ret' instruction,
Despicably dishonest attempt at the straw-man deception.
>
If not true, show how HHH reaches the 'ret' instruction.--
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.