Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals ---PSR---

On 3/8/2025 9:00 AM, dbush wrote:

On 3/8/2025 9:03 AM, olcott wrote:

On 3/8/2025 2:47 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

>
So, we agree that any simulator that tries to simulate *itself* cannot possibly reach the end of its simulation.

>
Apparently you don't understand that inputs to a
simulating termination analyzer specifying infinite
recursion or recursive emulation cannot possibly
reach their own final state and terminate normally.

 Apparently you don't understand that inputs to a termination analyzer, simulating or otherwise, are specified by the specification that is the halting function:
 (<X>,Y) maps to 1 if and only if X(Y) halts when executed directly
(<X>,Y) maps to 0 if and only if X(Y) does not halt when executed
 And HHH(DD)==0 fails to meet the above specification

Until you understand how and why this is necessary
correct strongly held misconceptions will persist:
DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach
its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally
because DD calls HHH(DD) in recursive emulation.
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer