Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals ---PSR---

On 3/8/2025 9:24 PM, dbush wrote:

On 3/8/2025 10:20 PM, olcott wrote:

>
*WHEN YOU UNDERSTAND THIS THEN YOU KNOW YOU WERE WRONG*
Replacing the code of HHH with an unconditional simulator and subsequently running HHH(DD) cannot possibly reach
its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally
because DD calls HHH(DD) in recursive emulation.
>

>
And when that code is not replaced HHH does a partial simulation of a computation that halts, as demonstrated by DD halting when executed directly.

 That Straw-man deception looks ridiculously stupid
when I challenge you to provide the line-by-line
machine code addresses of DD correctly emulated by
HHH such that DD reaches its own "ret" instruction
and terminates normally.
 _DD()
[00002133] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
[00002134] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
[00002136] 51         push ecx      ; make space for local
[00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD
[0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD)
[00002141] 83c404     add esp,+04
[00002144] 8945fc     mov [ebp-04],eax
[00002147] 837dfc00   cmp dword [ebp-04],+00
[0000214b] 7402       jz 0000214f
[0000214d] ebfe       jmp 0000214d
[0000214f] 8b45fc     mov eax,[ebp-04]
[00002152] 8be5       mov esp,ebp
[00002154] 5d         pop ebp
[00002155] c3         ret
Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155]