Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Semantic Property of Finite String

Am Thu, 13 Mar 2025 15:46:51 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 3/13/2025 4:27 AM, joes wrote:

Am Wed, 12 Mar 2025 21:41:34 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 3/12/2025 7:56 PM, dbush wrote:

On 3/12/2025 8:41 PM, olcott wrote:

>
NOT WHEN IT IS STIPULATED THAT THE BEHAVIOR BEING MEASURED IS

The direct execution of DDD

is proven to be different than the behavior of DDD emulated by HHH
according to the semantics of the x86 language.

Which is weird, considering that a simulator should produce the same
behaviour.

Right?

DECIDERS ARE REQUIRED TO REPORT ON THE SEMANTIC OR SYNTACTIC PROPERTY
OF THEIR INPUT FINITE STRINGS.

And not if the input called a different simulator that didn't abort.

DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own final state
no matter what HHH does.

It could, if it didn't disable the abort.

DDD correctly emulated by HHH1 does reach its own final state.

It must be doing something wrong then.

If someone was not a liar they would say that these are different
computations.

The simulators are different, but they are simulating the same computation
(duh).

--
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.