Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- posthumous reviewers

On 3/13/25 4:56 PM, olcott wrote:

On 3/13/2025 4:22 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-03-13 00:36:04 +0000, olcott said:
>

>
void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}
>
int DD()
{
   int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
   if (Halt_Status)
     HERE: goto HERE;
   return Halt_Status;
}
>
When HHH correctly emulates N steps of the
above functions none of them can possibly reach
their own "return" instruction and terminate normally.

>
Nevertheless, assuming HHH is a decider, Infinite_Loop and Infinite_Recursion
specify a non-terminating behaviour, DDD specifies a terminating behaviour

 _DDD()
[00002172] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
[00002173] 8bec       mov  ebp,esp  ; housekeeping
[00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
[0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
[0000217f] 83c404     add  esp,+04
[00002182] 5d         pop  ebp
[00002183] c3         ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]

Which isn't a program, since it doesn't include the code for HHH.

 What is the sequence of machine language
instructions of DDD emulated by HHH such that DDD
reaches its machine address 00002183?

That is a nonsense question, since your DDD isn't a program, and thus can't be correctly emulated beyond the call HHH instruction.
And, if we fix DDD to be a program by including that code, there is no requirement that HHH does such a correct emulation, and in fact, if we look at your work, it is clear that any HHH that tries to do suc a correct emulation just fails to be a decider, so any HHH that does answer for the DDD based on itself, didn't do a correct emulation, and thus was based on a nonsense question
Your quesiton is basically like, "If 1 + 2 = 5, what is 2 + 3?"

 Any failure to answer with the sequence of machine
addresses will be construed as
YOU KNOW THAT YOU ARE LYING OR DON'T UNDERSTAND THE QUESTON
 

No, your failure to understand the meaning of the words you use, and your admittion that =your whole argument is based on the FRAUD of redefining core terms to non-sense and thus evrything is just based on non-sensical strawmen, shows how utterly stupid you are.