Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Semantic Property of Finite String

On 3/13/2025 6:09 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 3/13/25 4:46 PM, olcott wrote:

On 3/13/2025 4:27 AM, joes wrote:

Am Wed, 12 Mar 2025 21:41:34 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 3/12/2025 7:56 PM, dbush wrote:

On 3/12/2025 8:41 PM, olcott wrote:

>
NOT WHEN IT IS STIPULATED THAT THE BEHAVIOR BEING MEASURED IS

>
The direct execution of DDD

>
is proven to be different than the behavior of DDD emulated by HHH
according to the semantics of the x86 language.

>
Which is weird, considering that a simulator should produce the same
behaviour.
>
>

DECIDERS ARE REQUIRED TO REPORT ON THE SEMANTIC OR SYNTACTIC PROPERTY OF
THEIR INPUT FINITE STRINGS.

And not if the input called a different simulator that didn't abort.
>

>
DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly
reach its own final state no matter what HHH
does.
>
DDD correctly emulated by HHH1 does reach its
own final state.

 Which shows that HHH doesn't correctly emulate its input, unless you just lied and gave the two programs different inputs.
 

void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}
Someone that is not a liar could explain exactly
how DDD emulated by HHH according to the semantics
of the C language must have the same behavior as
DDD emulated by HHH1 according to the semantics
of the C language.
Someone that is a liar will perpetually dodge
this challenge.
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer